Beyond the surface - unveiling the complexity of brain death and misdiagnoses in clinical practice

Like

Share this post

Choose a social network to share with, or copy the URL to share elsewhere

This is a representation of how your post may appear on social media. The actual post will vary between social networks

The concept of brain death, widely used to determine human death, remains complex and subject to ongoing debates. This manuscript explores the complexity of brain death and misdiagnoses in clinical practice. The diagnostic accuracy of brain death is crucial to avoid false positives and ensure the confirmation of death. The preservation of hypothalamic-pituitary function in brain-dead patients challenges the assumption of complete loss of brain function. Evidence suggests the presence of viable brain tissue and blood flow below detection thresholds, contradicting the irreversible cessation of brain functions. Several cases of individuals diagnosed as brain-dead have demonstrated brain function, including hypothalamic osmoregulation, and preserved neuroendocrine function. These findings question the reliability of the "whole-brain standard" and the "brainstem standard" used in determining brain death. False positive misdiagnoses of brain death remain a significant concern in clinical practice. Understanding the complexity of brain death and misdiagnoses is crucial for accurate assessments and ethical decision-making in medical practice.

Please sign in or register for FREE

If you are a registered user on Lippincott® Author Community, please sign in

Go to the profile of Dawn Angel
10 months ago

Congratulations on your publication!